Skip to main content
Glama
Aricode2005

ExpenseTracker

by Aricode2005

Related Servers

Alternatives to ExpenseTracker

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to add expenses, retrieve expenses by date range, and get spending summaries by category through MCP tools.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local tracking of personal expenses by adding, listing, summarizing, updating, and deleting expense records stored in a CSV file through an MCP client.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage personal expenses by adding entries, listing them by date range, and summarizing spending by category through MCP tools, while exposing category data as a resource.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing and analyzing personal expenses through MCP tools, including adding expense records, listing expenses within date ranges, and summarizing spending by category, with expense categories exposed as an MCP resource.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to track personal expenses through natural language interactions with comprehensive category support and financial summaries. Provides both local and remote MCP server options with SQLite storage for fast expense management operations.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Personal expense tracker MCP server that enables tracking expenses, income, budgets, and savings goals through natural language.
      10
      13 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: CRUD operations, search, export, and analytical aggregates. However, summarize_expenses, get_monthly_trend, and get_category_breakdown overlap in aggregation capabilities, though each targets a specific dimension (generic grouping vs. time trend vs. subcategory breakdown). Descriptions help disambiguate but slight confusion is possible.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_expense, add_expense, list_expenses, set_budget). No mixed conventions or vague verbs; naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for an expense tracker covering full CRUD plus search, export, and analytical summaries. Each tool has a clear purpose and none are redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full expense lifecycle (add, get, list, edit, delete) and adds search, export, budget management, and multiple aggregation views. No obvious gaps for the stated domain; it feels complete and self-sufficient.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues