Figma MCP Server with Chunking
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIGMA_ACCESS_TOKEN | Yes | Your Figma API access token |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_file_dataC | Get Figma file data with chunking and pagination |
| list_filesC | List files in a project or team |
| get_file_versionsC | Get version history of a Figma file |
| get_file_commentsC | Get comments on a Figma file |
| get_componentsB | Get components from a Figma file |
| get_stylesC | Get styles from a Figma file |
| get_file_nodesC | Get specific nodes from a Figma file |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting different aspects of Figma files: components, comments, file data, nodes, versions, styles, and file listing. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' or 'list_' prefixes (e.g., get_components, list_files). The naming is uniform and predictable, enhancing readability and usability.
With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a Figma integration, covering essential operations like retrieving file data, components, styles, comments, and versions. Each tool serves a specific purpose without being excessive or insufficient.
The toolset provides strong read-only coverage for Figma files, including data, components, styles, comments, versions, and file listing. However, it lacks write operations (e.g., creating or updating files, components, or comments), which could limit full lifecycle management, though agents can work around this for many use cases.