list_databases
List all databases accessible to your authenticated user on the ArcadeDB server.
Instructions
List all databases available to the authenticated user on the ArcadeDB server.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all databases accessible to your authenticated user on the ArcadeDB server.
List all databases available to the authenticated user on the ArcadeDB server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description mentions 'authenticated user', implying auth required, but omits details on permissions or output format. No annotations to supplement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, perfectly concise with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is complete and sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has zero parameters, so description does not need to add parameter info. Baseline score 4 as per guidelines.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'all databases', and it distinguishes from sibling tools like execute_command or query.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit alternatives or exclusions, but the purpose is clear and no competing tool for listing databases exists in siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ArcadeData/arcadedb'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server