Skip to main content
Glama
AraneaDev

Chaos-MCP

by AraneaDev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Chaos-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Testing MCP

      shalonjovan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A universal AI-powered testing server built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Allows AI agents to inspect, execute, test, monitor, debug, and report on software projects.
      3
      GNU Lesser General Public v2.1 only

    • CodeForgeX

      kirubeshvarman28
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform software engineering tasks inside an isolated, deterministic sandbox—exploring repositories, reproducing failures, applying patches, running tests, and verifying solutions against hidden suites through MCP tools.
      8
      MIT
    • faultline by Energixe

      faultlineofficial

      Energixe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Generates complete runnable adversarial test suites for your code, predicting the bugs they expose with exact code evidence, across multiple languages and test frameworks.
      MIT

    • Pinion

      namojo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered characterization test generator that reads Python functions or class methods, synthesizes inputs, captures behavior in a sandbox, and emits pytest files to lock legacy code behavior for safe refactoring.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct stage of the workflow: estimate_audit is pre-flight sizing, audit_code_resilience is a deep single-file mutation audit, and triage_test_coverage is a batch leaderboard. There is no meaningful overlap in purpose, and the descriptions make the differences explicit.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: estimate_audit, audit_code_resilience, triage_test_coverage. The verbs clearly indicate the operation and the objects describe the domain artifact being acted on.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is minimal but well-scoped for a focused mutation-testing server: estimate, single-file audit, and batch triage. Each tool earns its place and there is no filler or redundant utility.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: triage to find weak files, estimate to decide whether to audit, and audit to get detailed per-mutant survivor information. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of mutation-testing coverage analysis.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources