set_pattern

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'overwrite all multiplier values', implying destructive behavior, but lacks details on side effects, reversibility, or required permissions. The description is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the key purpose. However, it uses an 'Args' block which is unnecessary in a JSON context. Every sentence is useful but could be streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and 0% schema coverage, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values (output schema exists but is ignored), prerequisites, or error conditions. Compared to sibling tools, this description is too brief.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description briefly explains each parameter: network_id is 'session id', pattern_id is 'name of an existing pattern', values is 'new list of multiplier values'. This adds some meaning beyond schema titles, but no constraints or formatting hints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('overwrite') and the resource ('multiplier values for a named demand pattern'). It is specific and distinguishes from siblings like add_pattern (create) and get_patterns (read).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., pattern must exist) or contrast with similar tools like add_pattern.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.