Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Apeiron-Life

apeiron-mcp

by Apeiron-Life
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to apeiron-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • carechronicle-mcp

      Ankithraj-1312
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with clinical patient records using tools for document ingestion, structured conversion, patient profiling, record listing, search, and secure Q&A over patient documentation.
      -

    • MCP Wellness Agent

      yuvanshankarm007
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes wellness data such as sleep, activity, heart rate, and stress as MCP tools so AI agents can retrieve current vitals, pull historical records, and analyze trends. Supports simulated physiology along with Fitbit and planned Apple Health providers.
      MIT

    • whoop-ai-mcp

      fZimmermann03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to query recovery, sleep, HRV, strain, workouts, and personal health analytics in natural language through supported AI assistants, using read-only tools for daily status, baselines, trends, and period comparisons.
      16 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct data domains (cognitive, sleep, exercise, nutrition, cardio, fitness assessment). Potential confusion exists between the two summary tools and between domain-specific get_*_data and get_trends, but descriptions clarify raw versus derived data.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 11 tools use consistent snake_case with the get_ verb prefix followed by a descriptive noun phrase. The pattern is predictable and readable throughout, with only minor length variations.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a read-only health data aggregation server. Each tool maps to a distinct data source or summary type, with no obviously redundant tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core health domains (cognitive, sleep, exercise, nutrition, cardio, fitness assessments) plus summaries, trends, notes, and chat. Minor gaps include no client listing or metadata tool, but for a read-only aggregation API the coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources