Skip to main content
Glama
AntonIXO

vibescience-mcp

by AntonIXO
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to vibescience-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hive-exp

      who96
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server enabling AI agents to record, query, and share structured problem-solving experiences with human review and confidence decay.
      11
      MIT

    • trackio-mcp

      fcakyon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to observe and interact with trackio experiment tracking, providing tools for managing ML experiments through natural language.
      3
      MIT

    • hypotree

      tygryso
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A persistent, self-revising hypothesis DAG for agentic R&D, exposed as an MCP server. It enables agents to structure working knowledge as a directed acyclic graph of hypotheses, with automatic write-back belief revision and cascading pruning based on evidence.
      20
      12
      MIT

    • repro-mcp

      ABindoff
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that logs AI-assisted scientific computing sessions, capturing prompts, responses, decisions, and environment snapshots to human-readable markdown files for reproducibility.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: registration, listing, core experimental workflow, paper linking, and analysis. No two tools appear to overlap; even 'recall' is uniquely positioned as a pre-mortem gate.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (register_diagnostic, list_problems, propose_hypothesis). However, a few deviate: 'recall', 'causal_map', 'calibration', and 'reindex' use single verbs or nouns, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 17 tools, the set is well-scoped for a research experiment tracking system. Each tool serves a necessary role in registration, experimentation, analysis, or maintenance, without feeling bloated or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle (register, recall, problem definition, hypothesis proposal, experiment execution, diagnostics recording, closure, and analysis). Minor gaps include no explicit delete or update tools, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources