se_fin_search_enforcement

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states returns enforcement decisions but does not disclose read-only nature, authentication needs, or other behavioral traits. For a search tool, basic safety info is missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with dash, no padding. Front-loads purpose, but inclusion of Swedish terms may not be universally helpful. Generally concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple search tool: explains purpose and returns type. However, no output schema or mention of pagination/search behavior; reliant on param descriptions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). Description adds context about enforcement actions but not per-parameter meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Search' and specific resource 'Finansinspektionen enforcement actions', including Swedish terms and returns type. Distinguishes from sibling tools like search_regulations or about.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., se_fin_search_regulations). No when-not or context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.