Skip to main content
Glama
Ansvar-Systems

Security Controls MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Security Controls MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides search, detail lookup, and gap listing tools for a security control inventory, enabling natural language queries about control status and gaps.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Free hosted MCP server for EU compliance, enabling search across 8 frameworks, cross-framework mapping, policy generation, and gap assessment via natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive access to NIST cybersecurity frameworks and controls, enabling AI assistants and applications to query, analyze, and manage NIST security controls through a standardized interface.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and monitor European regulatory publications including GDPR, ISO27001, and AI Act. Supports creating monitoring topics, generating compliance briefs, and setting up notifications for regulatory updates.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated review and analysis of network security controls (AWS Security Groups, Network ACLs) using natural language queries. Supports NSC configuration reviews, network segmentation testing, and identifying security gaps through conversational LLM interaction.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides instant access to authoritative security documentation from organizations like OWASP, NIST, and major cloud providers through natural language semantic search. It enables users to retrieve security best practices, frameworks, and vulnerability information directly from a locally cached knowledge base.
      4
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: metadata (about, version_info), control retrieval/search/history/diff (get_control, search_controls, get_control_history, diff_control), framework operations (list_frameworks, get_framework_controls, get_framework_changes, map_frameworks), and standard clause access (get_clause, query_standard, list_available_standards, get_provision). No overlapping functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent pattern: verb_noun with verbs like get, list, search, map, diff, query. All use snake_case, and the pattern is predictable (e.g., get_control, list_frameworks, map_frameworks). Even special tools like about and version_info are conventional.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well-scoped for a security controls server. It covers metadata, version, controls CRUD (read/search/history/diff), standard querying, framework listing, mapping, and gap analysis without excess or deficiency.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is comprehensive for the domain: discovery (list, search), retrieval (get), comparison (diff), mapping, and gap analysis. Missing write operations are appropriate for a read-only reference server. No obvious gaps that would hinder agent tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSyncing