Skip to main content
Glama
Ansvar-Systems

Italian Data Protection MCP

by Ansvar-Systems
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Italian Data Protection MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • io.github.mister-franklin/gdpr

      mister-franklin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI-powered access to the largest EU GDPR enforcement decisions database, enabling semantic search, GDPR article lookup, and enforcement statistics across all EU/EEA Data Protection Authorities.
      4
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-bdm

      CarlSamma
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, read, and analyze Italian civil court decisions from the Ministry of Justice's Banca Dati di Merito, using CIE authentication.
      11
      -

    • UODO MCP

      pawelojdowski
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing decisions from the Polish Data Protection Authority (UODO) directly within AI clients, allowing full-text search, filtering, and retrieval of GDPR enforcement decisions.
      3
      19 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • lector

      namespaceMarcello
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and retrieve cited passages from the EU AI Act in English or Italian, including full articles and cross-references, so agents can ground answers in verified regulatory text.
      MIT

    • Law7 MCP

      mikhashev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with up-to-date legal documents from official sources, enabling accurate legal information retrieval and analysis.
      18
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search vs. get for decisions, search vs. get for guidelines, list topics, and server metadata. No two tools overlap in a way that would cause misselection, and the descriptions make the boundaries explicit.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of six tools follow a consistent it_dp_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern. The lone exception is it_dp_about, which is a metadata helper rather than a verb-led operation, but it is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a read-only legal-data server. Each tool maps to a core retrieval need without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers search and retrieval for both Garante decisions and guidelines, plus topic discovery and server metadata. Since the domain is external read-only data, create/update/delete operations are not applicable, and the retrieval lifecycle has no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources