Skip to main content
Glama
Ansvar-Systems

Finnish Law MCP Server

by Ansvar-Systems
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Finnish Law MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • finlex-mcp

      annasebedash-creator
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing direct, citable access to Finnish legislation by retrieving statute text from Finlex open data, enabling AI assistants to answer legal queries with accurate citations.
      -

    • se-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve consolidated Swedish statutes (SFS) from the Riksdagen open data API, with verifiable citations and persistent identifiers.
      4
      Apache 2.0

    • Dutch-law-mcp

      Ansvar-Systems
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables querying over 3,200 Dutch statutes (AVG, Wetboek van Strafrecht, Burgerlijk Wetboek, etc.) with verbatim, citation-grounded text from official sources, directly from MCP-compatible AI assistants.
      18
      48 npm
      13
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: validation, searching, retrieval, formatting, status checks, EU lookups, and metadata. Potential overlaps like validate_citation vs check_currency are clearly differentiated by input and purpose, and get_eu_basis vs get_provision_eu_basis are scoped by statute vs provision.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_legislation, get_provision, validate_eu_compliance). The single exception is 'about', which breaks the pattern, and get_provision_at_date has an extra preposition, though still clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is on the higher end of reasonable for a legal research server that spans statutes, case law, preparatory works, EU implementations, citation handling, and compliance. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, so the count feels justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers core workflows comprehensively: searching, retrieving, validating, formatting, historical versions, and EU compliance. A notable gap is the lack of a direct tool to fetch a full court decision text (only search_case_law with summaries and keywords), which agents may need for deep case analysis.

    Resources