Skip to main content
Glama
AnshuML

Istedlal MCP Server

by AnshuML
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Istedlal MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • fathom-mcp

      veer-mehta
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ingest documentation from websites or local files and perform semantic search over the indexed content using pgvector-backed embeddings.
      5
      MIT

    • rag-mcp

      NextLevelManagementAdvisors
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables ingestion and semantic search over text documents using PostgreSQL + pgvector and OpenAI-compatible embeddings, allowing any LLM agent to retrieve relevant chunks for grounded answers.
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • openhoard by openhoard

      openhoardofficial

      openhoard
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, retrieve, and share files by meaning across connected storage, with permission-aware access control and an audit trail.
      Apache 2.0

    • tiny-context

      Warddamn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents know things about files without reading them, supporting outline, search, slicing, SQL, log clustering, diffs, validation, and extraction for formats like PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, CSV, logs, and code.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_file_metadata retrieves specific file details by ID, search_files filters files based on explicit metadata criteria, and semantic_search_files finds files using natural language queries over embeddings. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: get_file_metadata, search_files, and semantic_search_files. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a file management domain, as it lacks essential operations like upload, delete, or update files. While the tools are well-defined, the count is borderline low for covering typical file lifecycle needs, potentially limiting agent workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set has significant gaps for file management: there are no tools for uploading, deleting, updating, or processing files, which are core operations in this domain. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform basic file lifecycle tasks, as the surface only supports retrieval and search functions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources