Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Essay Stats MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides text statistics and readability scores (Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level) via offline, keyless tools.
      191 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze text or files and receive numeric slop scores, band labels, specific violations with context, and concrete writing advice, using rule-based diagnostics with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      2
      25 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to check AI-assisted drafts for writing-pattern findings, locally clean selected hidden Unicode and lookalike characters, and optionally request API-key-authorized rewrites.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze inline prose or files on disk for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. Uses purely programmatic, configurable rules with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze text strings or files for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0–100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. It performs this rule-based linting locally without LLM judges or API calls.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct analysis type (counting, readability formulas, style checks, limit comparison, frequency), so selection is mostly clear. The one overlap is count_text vs check_word_limit, since both report word counts; the descriptions distinguish them by the limit/exclusion features, but an agent could still pick the wrong one for a simple count.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use consistent snake_case, which is good. However, the conventions are mixed: count_text and check_word_limit are verb-led, while readability_scores, style_flags and word_frequency are bare noun phrases, so there is no single predictable pattern to infer a new tool's name from.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for an essay analysis server, and each covers a genuinely different analytical output (counts/pages, readability grades, style issues, word limits, frequency). No tool feels redundant or like padding.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main essay-statistics workflows: length, page estimation, readability, style flags, limit checks and repetition. Minor gaps remain, such as no grammar/spelling check, sentence-length distribution, or citation handling beyond the references exclusion option, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues