arXiv MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARXIV_STORAGE_DIR | No | Directory for downloaded papers | ~/.arxiv-mcp/papers |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| searchA | Search arXiv papers by title, keywords, or arXiv ID. |
| get_paperA | Get the full text of an arXiv paper. |
| list_downloaded_papersB | List all locally downloaded papers. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_paper retrieves full text or sections of a specific paper, list_downloaded_papers shows locally stored papers, and search finds papers based on queries. The descriptions make it easy to differentiate between retrieving, listing local content, and searching.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_paper, list_downloaded_papers, search), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations or mixed conventions.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for an arXiv domain that might benefit from more operations like filtering searches, managing downloads, or accessing metadata. While the tools cover basic needs, the count is borderline low for comprehensive arXiv interaction.
The tools cover core arXiv operations (search, retrieve, list local), but there are notable gaps such as no ability to download papers, update local storage, or access advanced metadata. Agents can work around this by using existing tools, but the surface is incomplete for full paper management workflows.