find_good_dates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains the evaluation method (traditional Chinese calendar) and output (ranked dates with score), but omits behavioral traits like whether it's read-only, any side effects, or authentication needs. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences covering purpose, method, use cases, and optional parameters. Content is front-loaded and every sentence adds value, though could be slightly more structured (e.g., bullet points for parameters).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters, no output schema, and many siblings, the description provides sufficient context: explains input range, activity, culture (default Chinese), and output as ranked dates. It lacks explicit output format details but 'top favorable dates ranked by their auspiciousness score' is adequate for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description adds context about 'auspiciousness score' and ranking, but does not significantly augment the schema's built-in descriptions. Baseline score is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it searches for auspicious dates within a range using traditional Chinese calendar methods, returning top favorable dates ranked by score. This distinguishes it from siblings like check_auspicious_date (single date) or batch_check_dates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions ideal use cases (weddings, business openings, travel) and hints at limiting results, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings (e.g., for range vs single date) or provide 'when not to use' guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.