SIRI_SX_Disruptions_siri_sx

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It implies a read operation ('Returns') but fails to disclose any behavioral traits like idempotency, auth requirements, or rate limits, leaving significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short with one sentence and an empty 'Parameters:' section. It is under-specified, lacking any structure like bullet points or examples that would help the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's single parameter and the presence of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not differentiate from siblings, explain the 'kwargs' parameter, or describe the context of disruptions (e.g., transport mode, region).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'kwargs' is a string, but the description does not explain its purpose or expected value. With 0% schema description coverage, the agent has no guidance on how to populate this parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Returns all disruptions', which provides a verb and resource but is vague. It does not differentiate from sibling tool SIRI_SX_Cancellations_siri_sx_cancellations, leaving the agent uncertain about the scope or type of disruptions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as SIRI_SX_Cancellations. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, filtering, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.