Work Researcher MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Work Researcher MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover postings from watched company boards ranked by keyword fit, tailor and fact-check resumes against a source-cited profile, render ATS-readable PDFs, submit applications through the user's own browser, and track replies and follow-ups. All ranking, claim checking and email classification run as plain code, so LLM tokens are spent only on writing.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search company job boards and LinkedIn, judge job fit against a user profile, draft tailored one-page CVs and cover letters with fact-checking, and track applications through MCP tools. Also lets agents perform the AI writing steps themselves while the server enforces gates, verdicts, and document safety checks.33MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to autonomously search multiple job portals, score candidate-to-job fit with a dynamic 4-tier ATS engine, tailor resumes and cover letters, prepare applications, and export Word documents locally and privately.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to search nine job boards across eight countries for salary-transparent tech roles, filter by pay, remote work, tech stack, and seniority, and apply directly while tracking already-applied postings so duplicates never resurface.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to evaluate job postings under a UK visa constraint, including sponsor-licence checks with confidence grades, screening for seniority and hard requirements, and role searches that exclude recruitment agencies. It also tracks application history to help avoid duplicate applications.468 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, salary-filter, and apply to thousands of tech job postings across nine international job boards while automatically remembering which roles have already been applied to. It exposes board metadata, listings, and application flows as structured data an agent can drive directly.-
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct job-search, application, or browser action, and search_jobs/get_job/fetch_job_description are separated by source and purpose. The main boundary that needs care is browser_type vs browser_set, but their descriptions steer usage to different control types.
Domain tools consistently use verb_noun (search_jobs, start_application, record_application), and browser tools share a predictable browser_ prefix. A few noun-style names like browser_tabs, browser_snapshot, and browser_form break the otherwise verb-first pattern.
At 29 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold and feels heavy for a single MCP server. The browser_* primitives are individually distinct, but bundling a full browser automation suite with the job-application domain layer makes the surface larger than necessary.
The tool set covers the full workflow: searching and deduplicating jobs, fetching fuller descriptions, managing blocklists and CVs, checking prior applications, starting and recording applications, and driving the browser through manual forms. There are no obvious dead ends; truncated descriptions have a dedicated fetch tool and form interactions have snapshot/form/set/click/upload primitives.