Skip to main content
Glama
AndersHsueh

AX Local Operations MCP Server

by AndersHsueh
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AX Local Operations MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Node.js MCP Server

      WeiWeicode
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables file operations, mathematical calculations with unit conversions, and system information retrieval. Provides secure access to local file system, calculator functions with statistics, and system monitoring capabilities.
      2 npm
      ISC

    • Shell MCP

      luciVuc
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that enables AI assistants to execute shell commands, manage files, monitor system resources, and automate complex workflows with advanced features like stock tracking and web automation.
      7
      6 npm
      MIT

    • R-Shell

      MageGojo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI assistants to securely operate remote servers via persistent SSH sessions, with tools for command execution, file transfer, directory listing, and system monitoring.
      4
      MIT

    • MCP Shell Server

      mako10k
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for shell operations, terminal management, and process control, enabling AI assistants to safely execute commands and manage interactive sessions.
      13
      153 npm
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes with clear boundaries, such as file_edit for line-level editing versus file_operation for basic file operations. However, there is some overlap between file_operation and file_edit, as both handle file modifications, which could cause minor confusion. Overall, the descriptions help differentiate them effectively.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with a clear verb_noun structure, such as execute_command, file_compare, and task_manager. There are no deviations or mixed conventions, making the naming predictable and easy to understand across the entire set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 13 tools, the count is reasonable for a local operations server covering file management, system commands, and task tracking. It is slightly on the higher side but well-scoped, as each tool addresses a specific operational need without obvious redundancy, though it could be streamlined.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for local operations, including file handling, command execution, environment management, and task tracking. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for network operations or process management, but core workflows are well-supported, allowing agents to perform most common tasks effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources