get_boe_summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of disclosure. It merely states the action and date format without describing what the summary contains, potential error cases, or any side effects. A read-only tool should still indicate return structure or limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single clear sentence and an Args list. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and immediately gives the parameter detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description is minimally viable but lacks detail about what the summary includes or how to interpret the response. It also doesn't address ambiguity with the similar sibling 'get_borme_summary'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds significant meaning to the single parameter 'fecha' by specifying the expected format (AAAAMMDD) and providing an example (20240501). This compensates for the low schema description coverage (0%).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Obtener' = get) and resource ('sumario del BOE') with a specific date parameter. It distinguishes from the sibling 'get_borme_summary' by clearly targeting BOE rather than BORME.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. The usage context is only implied by the tool name and the single date parameter, not explained.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.