Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ClawdCursor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Cross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
      20
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing AI-friendly computer-use primitives (capture, detect, click) to let LLM agents drive desktop GUI applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
      45 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents and MCP clients direct control over native desktop apps, Chrome/Electron browsers, and Android devices with screenshots, OCR, accessibility-based element lookup, input simulation, window management, CDP, and ADB in one local server.
      138
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The seven tools are organized around clear domains: accessibility, browser DOM, raw computer control, OS windows, system utilities, batch orchestration, and delegated tasks. There are documented overlaps such as browser.navigate vs window.navigate and window.open_url vs system.open_url, plus task/batch/direct-call routing, but the descriptions give strong preference guidance so an agent can usually choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names are lowercase single-token category labels, which is predictable and consistent. The set is not verb_noun because these are compound tools, and batch/task are slightly more function-oriented than the resource/category nouns, but the overall convention is coherent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven compound tools is well-scoped for a computer-use automation server: each covers a distinct execution layer and earns its place. The large action lists are grouped under appropriate categories rather than split into dozens of separate tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the major GUI automation lifecycle: perceiving UI via accessibility/browser/OCR, acting via clicks/types/invoke, managing windows, clipboard/keys/user handoff, batching, and delegating full tasks. Minor gaps exist around some browser navigation conveniences and cross-tool duplication, but no major dead ends are apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week