Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
ClawdCursor

ClawdCursor

by AmrDab
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ClawdCursor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • da-mcp

      cioinside
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Cross-platform desktop automation MCP server that lets AI agents capture screenshots, run OCR with UI-element classification, control mouse/keyboard, and launch programs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
      20
      1
      MIT

    • openowl

      mihir-kanzariya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
      5
      Apache 2.0

    • Windows Control MCP

      Scofield81
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to inspect and control a Windows machine through permission-gated tools for system information, windows, UI elements, files, applications, screenshots, input, and multi-step workflows.
      -

    • OpenEyes

      yangpeng366
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing AI-friendly computer-use primitives (capture, detect, click) to let LLM agents drive desktop GUI applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
      2
      MIT

    • windows-computer-use-mcp

      Einosensokami
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
      119 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are cleanly divided by modality—accessibility, computer, browser, window, system—and the descriptions explicitly steer between them (e.g., prefer accessibility for named elements, use computer only for pixel-level control). Minor overlap remains: open_app/open_file/open_url and navigate appear across system, window, and browser, and the deprecated task tool overlaps with direct agent operation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All seven tools are lowercase single-word category nouns (accessibility, system, computer, window, browser, batch, task), a consistent and predictable pattern. Sub-actions are namespaced under each tool's action parameter, keeping top-level naming uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven top-level tools is well within the 3–15 sweet spot for a desktop-automation server, with each tool earning its place as a distinct modality. Even counting the deprecated task tool, the surface is not bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    Covers the full automation lifecycle: perception (accessibility tree, DOM, OCR, screenshot), action (invoke, click, type), window management, clipboard, shortcuts, user handoff, and batching. Deprecated entries (task, delegate) are the only signs of missing or outdated operations; there are no major workflow dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessLimited data

    Resources