Tubask
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tubask
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI tools to access YouTube content, including transcript extraction, video/channel info, and search.412 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceConnect AI assistants to YouTube: search, transcripts, metadata, and more.1957 npm6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, watch, summarize, clip, and extract transcripts from YouTube videos, all without needing an API key or leaving the chat.911 npm53Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancehuuh.me is AI-native Youtube - dead easy AI for people with stuff to do - collaborative AI projects for teams - public AI-native knowledge sharing - monetization of AI-native content streams-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read transcripts of any public video, research channels, analyze performance, read comments, and manage multiple owned channels.1617 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides distraction-free access to YouTube by allowing AI assistants to retrieve subscribed channels, latest videos, and transcripts without algorithmic recommendations. It enables searching within subscriptions and direct reading of video content through simple browser cookie authentication.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: youtube_query handles searching and channel/playlist/comment queries, summarize_video produces summaries from captions, and get_transcript returns raw caption text. There is no overlap in core functionality, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other to clarify boundaries.
The tools all use lowercase snake_case but do not follow a uniform verb_noun pattern. 'summarize_video' and 'get_transcript' start with verbs, while 'youtube_query' starts with a noun, creating a slight inconsistency. However, the naming style is still predictable and readable.
With exactly three tools, the server is well-scoped and each tool is substantial. The count is within the ideal 3-15 range and covers the primary YouTube interaction modes without unnecessary bloat.
The server covers a broad range of YouTube data: searching, channel profiles, playlist items, comments, summaries, and transcripts. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct video metadata endpoint without a summary, but the existing tools work together to cover most reasonable use cases.