refresh_dataset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses the confirm requirement, which implies a two-step or confirmation-based behavior, but it does not explicitly state that refresh is destructive or what the side effects are. This adds some transparency but leaves ambiguity about the preview vs refresh semantics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the action and requirement. No wasted words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter tool with no annotations or output schema, the description covers the core action and the confirm flag, but it does not describe return values or the difference between preview and refresh outcomes. Some ambiguity remains about the tool's behavior, making it slightly incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate. It clarifies that confirm must be true for the operation to proceed, which is essential. However, it does not elaborate on dataset_id, which is self-explanatory but still undocumented. The description adds marginal value over the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: preview or refresh dataset columns from its SQL. The verb 'refresh' and resource 'dataset columns' make it specific, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like update_dataset_sql by focusing on column refresh rather than SQL modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a key operational requirement (confirm=true) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions or alternative tool references are given; usage context is only implied through the tool's name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.