Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to kaiten-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with Kaiten project management through its REST API. Enables managing spaces, boards, cards, comments, checklists, tags, and time logs.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with Kaiten (kaiten.ru) project management. Supports listing, moving tasks, setting responsible persons, and adding comments via natural language.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server and CLI tool for interacting with Kaiten project management API, optimized for token efficiency. Enables AI assistants to search, create, update, and manage tasks with minimal token usage.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating Kaiten API with Claude Desktop, enabling management of cards, comments, spaces, and boards with advanced features like verbosity control, response format selection, and auto-truncation.
      6 npm
      31
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 63 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct resource-action pair, and the few potentially overlapping tools (search_cards vs get_space_cards/get_board_cards, list_card_tags vs list_workspace_tags) are explicitly cross-referenced and disambiguated in their descriptions. The descriptions consistently tell the agent where IDs come from and which alternate tool to use, so misselection risk is low.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a kaiten_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern with predictable verbs like get, list, create, update, delete, add, and remove. The main deviation is mixing get and list for collection-style tools (get_card_comments, get_space_cards, get_user_timelogs vs list_boards, list_spaces), plus a few one-off verbs like release and attach, but the overall pattern remains readable and consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    63 tools is far beyond the 25+ threshold and creates a heavy tool surface for an agent to navigate, even though the domain is broad. Several tools could be consolidated or exposed through verbosity options (e.g. get_space_cards/get_board_cards vs search_cards, get_card includeChildren vs list_subtasks), so the count feels over-scoped rather than well-trimmed.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides thorough lifecycle coverage for cards, comments, timelogs, checklists, tags, files, members, blockers, external links, and sprints, including create/read/update/delete where the API supports it. Minor gaps exist: no board/space creation or administration, no explicit archive/unarchive card tool, and no global tag deletion or custom property management, but most workflows complete without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues