repurpose_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses the automatic process but lacks details on side effects (e.g., original video unchanged), output format, or prerequisites. More behavioral context like 'does not modify original' or 'requires ffmpeg' would improve.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear Chinese sentence that front-loads the main action. No wasted words; every part is meaningful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists and all parameters are documented in the schema, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and behavior. No major gaps are apparent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all parameters. The description adds overall context but does not significantly enhance individual parameter understanding beyond the schema (e.g., what 'informative' style entails).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool repurposes long videos into short videos for target platforms, specifying actions like auto-detect highlights, crop, add subtitles, adjust ratio. It is distinct from sibling tools like 'analyze_content_tool' or 'highlight_reel_tool' which are sub-steps.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for repurposing long videos to short form, but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives or when not to use. It is clear enough that this is the main repurposing tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.