createPet
Add a new pet by providing a name and an optional tag.
Instructions
Create a pet
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | Yes |
Add a new pet by providing a name and an optional tag.
Create a pet
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only says 'Create a pet'—no disclosure of side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or any behavioral traits beyond the implied mutation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (3 words) but under-specified, omitting critical information. Conciseness should not sacrifice completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, one required nested parameter, and no annotations, the description fails to provide necessary context about return values, parameter semantics, or behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the single required parameter 'body' or its properties. No guidance on how to populate the nested object with 'tag' and 'name'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the verb (create) and resource (pet), but essentially repeats the tool name without adding specificity. It does not distinguish from siblings like getPet or listPets, though the action is different.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No context about prerequisites, conditions, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Amanbig/mcpify'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server