Skip to main content
Glama
Amana03

Universal MCP Server

by Amana03
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Universal MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-common-server

      tamilts124
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Zero-dependency MCP server that provides AI models with secure read/write/exec access to local files and directories over HTTP and SSE, designed to be tunneled via ngrok for integration with Claude Web.
      -

    • MCP Complete Implementation

      saksham0712
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a complete end-to-end MCP server implementation with file system tools, web scraping capabilities, and system information access. Includes ready-to-use configuration files and integration examples for Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, and other AI models.
      6
      -

    • local-mcp

      fan-67
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight, stdio-based MCP server enabling AI assistants to perform local file system operations like reading, writing, searching, and executing commands.
      2,456 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: delete_file removes files, search_files finds files based on content, and write_file creates or modifies files. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool without confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (delete_file, search_files, write_file) using snake_case throughout. This predictability enhances readability and usability for agents.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Universal MCP Server' name, suggesting it might lack broader functionality. However, for basic file operations, the count is borderline but manageable, as it covers core actions without being excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is significantly incomplete for file operations, missing essential actions like read_file or list_files, which are critical for a comprehensive file management system. This gap will likely cause agent failures when trying to access or list file contents.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources