Skip to main content
Glama
Alvi-808

content-qa-mcp

by Alvi-808

Related Servers

Alternatives to content-qa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform live Google SERP searches, run on-page and full-site SEO audits with prioritized fixes, and check brand visibility in AI answer engines via four MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes 43 writing tools to any MCP-capable agent host, enabling clarifying questions, outline generation, drafting, revision, anti-AI audit, reader profiling, and export as one guided workflow. It learns the user's voice from their tracked edits and can distill a project directory into reports, READMEs, or blog posts based on the user's style.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform instant SEO, performance, and security audits of any website through the Model Context Protocol. It provides comprehensive analysis without requiring API keys or configuration.
      11
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run live SEO/readiness audits against 50+ AI crawlers, validate schema and robots.txt, and generate llms.txt, robots.txt, and JSON-LD files directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      8
      138 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients to audit public sites across six areas, check and follow llms.txt links, compare rival sites side by side, and run sixteen content gates on local Markdown or MDX using only free public signals.
      4
      38 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      4
      2
      11 npm
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of content QA: readability, AI tells, on-page SEO, and a combined full report. There's no overlapping purpose; the full report explicitly aggregates the other three, which is clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase_with_underscores and are descriptive noun phrases. Minor inconsistency in word type ('report', 'check', 'scan') but no mixing of conventions, so it's mostly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a content QA server, covering the core checks and an aggregated report. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary bloat or overly thin coverage.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the primary QA dimensions for articles: readability, AI-writing tells, and on-page SEO, plus a comprehensive report. There are no obvious missing operations for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues