Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
CountdownMCP

CountdownMCP

by AlonTsur1601
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CountdownMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • headroom

      tyejcoleman
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides real-time rate-limit and context budget awareness to Claude Code, enabling it to plan tasks that fit within its constraints and defer work when needed.
      10 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • OpenCodex Quota MCP

      wujiseclusion
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only local MCP server that lets tool-capable models query provider quotas, balances, reset times, and account-pool aggregates from a local OpenCodex dashboard. It also filters by provider and returns timestamps while keeping credentials and tokens out of results.
      1
      MIT

    • AAS Core (agentic-awesome

      26BB
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, read-only MCP server that lets coding agents search the complete AAS skill catalog, compose and validate agent-chosen skill stacks, and generate reproducible, reviewable plans without uploading project code.
      6,098 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves usage information, the other provides advisory ranking for work. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same verb_noun pattern with the 'countdown_' prefix: countdown_get_usage and countdown_advise_work. The naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin, but it is appropriately scoped for its narrow purpose of usage monitoring and work advising. It falls into the borderline category.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core needs: reading usage and advising on work. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit plan management or limit adjustment), but the described advisory scope is adequately served.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources