A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server that provides real-time rate-limit and context budget awareness to Claude Code, enabling it to plan tasks that fit within its constraints and defer work when needed.
5 npm
Apache 2.0
CountdownMCP
by AlonTsur1601
Related Servers
Alternatives to CountdownMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes a single tool to retrieve ChatGPT/Codex quota via the signed-in Codex CLI, reporting rate-limit windows and usage percentages.1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes Claude Code's real-time rate limit usage so that an orchestrator can check remaining capacity before launching subtasks.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local, read-only MCP server that lets coding agents search the complete AAS skill catalog, compose and validate agent-chosen skill stacks, and generate reproducible, reviewable plans without uploading project code.3,212 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets MCP clients inspect, create, update, and deploy ChatGPT Sites through a local Codex installation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that provides AI agents with live, structured workspace awareness, including project listing, git status, and budgeted context packing, minimizing token usage.3 npm2MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves usage information, the other provides advisory ranking for work. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the same verb_noun pattern with the 'countdown_' prefix: countdown_get_usage and countdown_advise_work. The naming is consistent and predictable.
Tool Count3/5
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin, but it is appropriately scoped for its narrow purpose of usage monitoring and work advising. It falls into the borderline category.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the core needs: reading usage and advising on work. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit plan management or limit adjustment), but the described advisory scope is adequately served.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues