A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables agents to assess counterparty risk, token danger, and wallet creditworthiness on Base by analyzing contract powers and controlling wallet reputation.
MIT
revettr
Related Servers
Alternatives to revettr
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceReputation scoring for AI agent wallets on Base. 9 tools for trust scores, fraud checks, blacklist lookups, leaderboard, badge generation, and agent registration with x402 payment verification.927 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceZero-key on-chain intelligence for Base, Ethereum, and Solana. Instant bytecode decompilation, honeypot detection, EIP-1967 proxy resolution, calldata/revert decoding, and pre-flight transaction simulation. No API keys or wallet connection required.131MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceTrust scoring, scam detection, and EAS attestations for ERC-8004 + x402 agents on Base.1868 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceTrust layer for AI agents: 22 pay-per-call x402 tools for scam and fraud checks, payment pre-flight, wallet screening, policy approvals, contact extraction and company research. Free preview with no wallet; paid calls settle in USDC on Base.22104 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancex402 utilities for AI agents on Base: USDC payment verification, wallet risk scores and signed receipts. $0.01 USDC per call via x402.MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
With only a single tool available, there is no possibility of overlap or confusion with other tools. The 'score_counterparty' tool has a unique, specific purpose with no alternatives to misselect.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('score_counterparty'). With only one tool in the set, there are no naming convention inconsistencies to evaluate.
Tool Count3/5
A single tool represents a minimal surface that feels thin for a financial risk assessment domain. While it covers the core scoring action, the lack of supporting tools (e.g., retrieving historical scores, listing past screenings) limits workflow flexibility.
Completeness3/5
The tool covers the primary 'score' operation but lacks complementary lifecycle operations such as retrieving previous scores, listing screening history, or batch processing. Notable gaps exist for audit trails and historical verification workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive