Create sections

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It states the tool adds sections and implies they are visual containers via the swimlane analogy, but it does not mention limits (e.g., maxItems 50), permissions, or side effects. The description adds some context beyond the name but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, actionable, and free of redundancy. The description front-loads the core purpose and then adds a critical cross-tool usage note, earning its place entirely.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one parameter (nested object) and no output schema, the description gives a high-level picture and a usage tip, but it omits any guidance about the 'items' parameter structure. The schema's nested descriptions partially fill this gap, but the top-level parameter remains unexplained, leaving a moderate completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention any parameters. The input schema has nested descriptions for the section properties, but the top-level 'items' parameter itself lacks a description, and the tool description does nothing to clarify its structure. With schema description coverage reported as 0%, the description was expected to compensate but does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates 'named sections' and provides a helpful analogy ('FigJam equivalent of a labelled swimlane or column'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like create_stickies or create_shapes by focusing on sections as a distinct container-like resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit guidance on how to use the tool in conjunction with other create tools ('Pass a section id as parentId on other create tools to place content inside it'). This conveys both the purpose and a key usage pattern, though it does not explicitly mention when to avoid using this tool or name alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.