mcp-decision-lab
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-decision-lab
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA local, open-source MCP server that provides deterministic organizational tools for structured decisions, guided reflection, action planning, and transparent digital report outlines without requiring an API key.642 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that records decisions, rejected alternatives, and justifications, and retrieves them later to avoid re-litigating past choices. It stores data locally in SQLite and Markdown.262 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for verifying high-impact decisions with Trust OS.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server that implements sequential thinking protocols, provides structured problem-solving methods, decomposes complex problems into manageable steps, and supports iterative optimization and alternative reasoning paths.12Apache 2.0
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables deployment and management of MCP servers through a simple configuration-based interface.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a distinct role in the workflow (start, score, inspect, analyze, simulate, export, list, delete), and descriptions clarify boundaries. There is mild potential overlap between analyze and what_if, and between analyze and get_matrix, but the descriptions cleanly separate stored analysis from hypothetical re-ranking and raw inspection.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (start_decision, score_option, get_matrix, delete_decision, export_decision, list_decisions). The bare verbs 'analyze' and 'what_if' are minor deviations but remain readable and unambiguous.
Eight tools cleanly map onto a decision-analysis lifecycle with no superfluous entries. Each tool earns its place and the count is well within a comfortable range.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: create, score, inspect, analyze, simulate, export, list, and delete. A minor gap is the absence of an update/edit tool for changing the question, options, or criteria after start_decision, which agents would have to work around by restarting.