Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-decision-lab

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local, open-source MCP server that provides deterministic organizational tools for structured decisions, guided reflection, action planning, and transparent digital report outlines without requiring an API key.
      6
      42 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that records decisions, rejected alternatives, and justifications, and retrieves them later to avoid re-litigating past choices. It stores data locally in SQLite and Markdown.
      2
      62 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that implements sequential thinking protocols, provides structured problem-solving methods, decomposes complex problems into manageable steps, and supports iterative optimization and alternative reasoning paths.
      1
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the workflow (start, score, inspect, analyze, simulate, export, list, delete), and descriptions clarify boundaries. There is mild potential overlap between analyze and what_if, and between analyze and get_matrix, but the descriptions cleanly separate stored analysis from hypothetical re-ranking and raw inspection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (start_decision, score_option, get_matrix, delete_decision, export_decision, list_decisions). The bare verbs 'analyze' and 'what_if' are minor deviations but remain readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools cleanly map onto a decision-analysis lifecycle with no superfluous entries. Each tool earns its place and the count is well within a comfortable range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: create, score, inspect, analyze, simulate, export, list, and delete. A minor gap is the absence of an update/edit tool for changing the question, options, or criteria after start_decision, which agents would have to work around by restarting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues