mcp-ess-proposal
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-ess-proposal
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables turning an address or lat/lng into a transparent solar proposal by geocoding it, pulling Google Solar API building insights (panel layouts, roof segments, imagery quality), and pricing a few system sizes with your tariff, install cost, incentives, savings, payback, NPV and a verdict. Every input is labelled with its source, Google's own financial analyses are shown side by side, and no prices are invented.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to size hybrid renewable energy systems by simulating candidate designs hour-by-hour for a full year, filtering out constraint violations, and ranking remaining options by net present cost and related techno-economic metrics.27 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables portable-battery outage planning by exposing tools that retrieve an example scenario, compute usable AC energy and runtime, select protected and optional loads, and compare plans under energy, continuous-power, and startup-surge limits. It returns structured calculations and spoken summaries for rehearsing what can stay powered before an outage.MIT

security-orchestraofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides deterministic, standards-based calculations for data center critical power infrastructure. Enables site selection, generator sizing, UPS sizing, NFPA 110 compliance, and more via 50+ AI agents and 8 compound chains.-- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered BESS quoting & energy sales intelligence for Claude and any MCP client610 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables home solar energy planning by estimating PV output, validating consumption plans against generation and battery constraints, and automatically shifting flexible loads to ensure power availability during scheduled outages.-
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool is exposed, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The tool's purpose is clearly stated and unambiguous.
The single tool name follows a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern: generate_ess_proposal. There are no other names to introduce inconsistency.
A single tool makes the server feel thin and leaves no room for composing related proposal operations. The scope is focused, but the tool surface is borderline for an MCP server.
The server covers the core proposal-generation workflow directly. Minor gaps exist around supporting operations like input validation or scenario comparison, but agents can work around them because the one tool returns a complete result.