listar_posts_facebook
List all Facebook Page posts, including scheduled ones, for content overview.
Instructions
Lista los posts de la Página de Facebook (incluye los programados).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
List all Facebook Page posts, including scheduled ones, for content overview.
Lista los posts de la Página de Facebook (incluye los programados).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It adds one behavioral trait (includes scheduled posts) but omits pagination, rate limits, authentication needs, or error handling. Very minimal disclosure beyond the core action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no superfluous words. It is concise, though it could optionally add a brief note about the return type without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate: it states the action and one behavioral detail (scheduled posts). However, it lacks return format, pagination hints, or ordering, which would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description does not mention the 'limit' parameter at all. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, failing to compensate for the lack of parameter documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists posts from a Facebook page, including scheduled ones. It uses a specific verb (list) and resource (posts) and distinguishes from sibling tools like publicar_facebook or instagram-based tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites, exclusions, or context about when not to use it. The description only implies usage for listing posts but doesn't help the agent decide between this and similar tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Alan7799DE/ClaudeMetaMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server