opencode-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to opencode-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceBridges any MCP client (like Claude Code, Zed, VS Code) to any ACP coding agent, enabling multi-agent orchestration from a single chat interface.24109 npm9Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA local MCP bridge that lets ChatGPT control opencode sessions for code modification, file reading, and repository management on your own computer.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP bridge from OpenCode to Cursor agent CLI, enabling code review, debugging, and planning via Cursor cloud.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceBridges multiple CLI coding agents (Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Claude, Antigravity) into any MCP client, enabling delegation of prompts, parallel execution, and code review workflows.648 npmMozilla Public 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA project-local MCP bridge that allows Codex Desktop to plan tasks and OpenCode to execute them within the current project directory, with session reuse and native OpenCode background subagents.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access unified development tools including code generation, documentation synchronization, test case rendering, and architecture graph queries through a single MCP server.-
TDQS
Scored across 87 tools
Many tools overlap heavily: opencode_session_list/opencode_sessions_overview/opencode_session_status, opencode_message_send/opencode_ask/opencode_reply/opencode_run, opencode_wait/opencode_check/opencode_job_get, and opencode_tui_* commands are numerous. An agent would struggle to pick the right tool among these near-duplicates.
The opencode_ prefix and mostly verb_noun pattern (e.g. opencode_session_create, opencode_file_read) is consistent. Minor deviations exist like opencode_ask, opencode_reply, opencode_fire, opencode_run, and opencode_log which break the verb_noun convention, but the overall pattern is predictable.
87 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped MCP server. The count is extreme and includes many overlapping or highly granular tools (e.g. 10 TUI tools, 6 provider tools, 5 job tools) that could be consolidated.
The surface is very comprehensive for the opencode domain: sessions, messages, files, providers, permissions, jobs, TUI, and VCS are all covered. There are no obvious dead ends, though the sheer number of tools makes it hard to verify every workflow.