Skip to main content
Glama
Akkshay10

mockserver-mcp

by Akkshay10

Related Servers

Alternatives to mockserver-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control HTTP Toolkit for intercepting, inspecting, and debugging HTTP(S) traffic from browsers, mobile devices, and Docker containers. It provides tools for server management, interceptor activation, and sending HTTP requests through natural language commands.
      23
      14 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that lets coding agents manage a local or remote WireMock instance through the WireMock Admin API, providing tools for creating, updating, deleting, and inspecting mock mappings and request journal entries.
      12
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A mock MCP server for testing MCP client implementations and development workflows. Supports tools, prompts, and resources across multiple transport protocols (stdio, HTTP, SSE).
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Mockzilla. Lets coding agents like Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor and Gemini CLI install the Mockzilla CLI and run API mocks from an OpenAPI spec or a single endpoint. Log in from the agent to deploy hosted mocks on mockzilla.org
      26
      34 npm
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a unique purpose: creating expectations, clearing/resetting (partial vs full), retrieving requests, checking status, and verifying requests. No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the pattern 'mockserver_verb' or 'mockserver_verb_noun', using snake_case consistently.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cover the essential operations for a mock server (create, clear, reset, retrieve, status, verify) without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    Core functionality is covered, but a tool to list current expectations would provide more complete lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues