status
Retrieve the browser's current status, such as whether it is running and the active URL.
Instructions
查看浏览器当前状态(是否启动、当前 URL 等)。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the browser's current status, such as whether it is running and the active URL.
查看浏览器当前状态(是否启动、当前 URL 等)。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Describes read-only operation checking launch status and URL. No annotations provided, so description covers key behavioral traits adequately, though error handling unspecified.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers main points but 'etc.' vague; could list all return fields or behavior when browser not launched. No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; schema coverage 100%. Description adds no parameter info, but baseline is 4 for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool views browser current status (launch state, current URL). Distinct from sibling action tools (launch, navigate, close) that modify state.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: use to check browser state before actions. No explicit alternatives or when-not guidance, but purpose is self-evident given siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Akioo77/browser-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server