Skip to main content
Glama
Aiven-Open

Aiven MCP Server

Official
by Aiven-Open

Related Servers

Alternatives to Aiven MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides access to Aiven's managed services (PostgreSQL, Kafka, ClickHouse, Valkey, OpenSearch) and connectors, enabling LLMs to build full stack solutions.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides AI models with structured access to external data and services, acting as a bridge between AI assistants and applications, databases, and APIs in a standardized, secure way.
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to access and interact with database connections, including viewing schemas and performing CRUD operations on connected databases.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to seamlessly interact with ClickHouse databases, supporting resource listing, schema retrieval, and query execution.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_service_details retrieves specific service information, list_projects enumerates projects, and list_services enumerates services. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_service_details, list_projects, list_services) with clear, descriptive names. The naming convention is uniform throughout the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels under-scoped for managing Aiven services, which typically involve operations like create, update, delete, or configure services. The count is too low for comprehensive coverage of the domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for a service management domain; it lacks essential CRUD operations (e.g., create_service, update_service, delete_service) and other key actions like managing configurations or monitoring, leaving significant gaps that will hinder agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive