engain_get_mention
Retrieve a specific mention from Reddit campaign management by providing its ID.
Instructions
Get a single mention by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mentionId | Yes |
Retrieve a specific mention from Reddit campaign management by providing its ID.
Get a single mention by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mentionId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only implies a read operation but omits details like required permissions, error handling, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (6 words) but lacks necessary detail. Front-loading is fine, but it sacrifices completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description should at least clarify what a 'mention' is and what fields are returned. It falls short.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name 'mentionId'. The phrase 'by ID' merely restates the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get a single mention by ID', which clearly indicates the action and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like engain_get_mention_brands or engain_get_mention_stats.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or caveats.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AimenHallou/engain-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server