Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to iqa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables action-bound authorization and verifiable evidence contracts for MCP tool execution, offering deterministic action planning, policy decisions, and one-use capability tokens tied to exact action envelopes.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate through a local, signed boundary that blocks prompt injection and secret leakage, verifies outputs, preserves cross-session memory, and provides offline-verifiable receipts. It also exposes 900+ MCP tools for discoverable agent actions.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create and verify tamper-evident cryptographic evidence, manage key-bound Agent Passports, and support verifiable handoffs, approvals, and audit trails through MCP, REST, and A2A.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for sovereign AES-256-GCM backup encryption and decryption. Enables encrypting, decrypting, verifying, and scoring passphrases with zero network calls.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for interacting with the Technocore agent protocol, including signed messaging, nonce management, DID verification, end-to-end encrypted communication, and untrusted data fencing.
      9 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to verify agent spending mandates and receipts, providing stateless tools for authorization, chain verification, credential verification, and DID resolution.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools have largely distinct purposes: derive_route_shard computes a shard, parse_envelope does structural decoding, verify_envelope does cryptographic verification, and published_vector returns a test fixture. parse_envelope and verify_envelope both operate on the same 128-byte envelope, which could momentarily confuse an agent, but the descriptions clearly separate 'structural, no key' from 'HMAC verification with organ_key'.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (derive_route_shard, parse_envelope, verify_envelope) with consistent imperative verbs. The fourth, published_vector, is a noun phrase rather than a verb_phrase, a minor deviation from the otherwise predictable convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a tight, well-scoped surface for a narrow cryptographic verification domain (derive, parse, verify, plus a self-test vector). It leans slightly thin, but each tool clearly earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full verify-a-lifecycle: deriving the intent shard, decoding the envelope, verifying it, and a published conformance vector for offline self-testing. The main gap is the absence of an encode/build or key-generation counterpart, though that may be intentionally out of scope for a stateless verifier.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues