Badgr — GPU Compute for AI Agents Copy
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Badgr — GPU Compute for AI Agents Copy
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to submit GPU job requests, select eligible workers, track execution, and retrieve results via MCP.1421MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceJungle Grid MCP Server lets AI agents submit, estimate, monitor, and retrieve logs for GPU workloads through Jungle Grid. It enables agentic execution for inference, training, fine-tuning, and batch jobs without manually choosing GPU providers or infrastructure.86 npm4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceZero-quota GPU orchestration MCP server — lets AI agents discover, provision, and manage GPU compute across multi-datacenter partner nodes (H100/H200/B200) through a single control plane.4128 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, reserve, and dispatch inference to GPU nodes via MCP tools, using signed handles for stateless reservation management.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides a persistent compute queue for AI agents, enabling them to submit hardware-aware GPU jobs, monitor execution, and retrieve results and artifacts across sessions via MCP tools.13MIT

relaygpu-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRelayGPU MCP gives AI agents access to 80+ open and closed AI models for text, image, video, audio and embeddings. Agents can discover models, check pricing, generate content and run workflows, with new models added to the catalogue regularly.14128 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
The set contains exact duplicate purposes: badgr_run and run_workload both run a one-off GPU job with identical descriptions, and badgr_serve and deploy_model both provision a persistent endpoint identically. badgr_status and check_result also overlap on deployment state inspection, making misselection highly likely.
Naming mixes a badgr_ prefix (badgr_run, badgr_status, badgr_logs) with unrelated generic verb_noun names (run_workload, deploy_model, check_result) and an unaffixed ai_chat. The duplication across naming schemes makes the surface feel inconsistent rather than deliberately organized.
Eleven tools is a reasonable raw count for the GPU compute domain, but two pairs are exact duplicates, so the effective surface is smaller and the count overstates the real capability. The set would be better scoped if duplicates were removed.
The lifecycle is broadly covered: run jobs, serve endpoints, check status/logs, tear down billing, call chat, and launch/check autonomous agent tasks. Minor gaps exist around pricing/model discovery or richer cost inspection, but core workflows are reachable.