Skip to main content
Glama
AiAgentKarl

political-finance-mcp-server

by AiAgentKarl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to political-finance-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • filed-mcp-server

      mgrantley
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents access to US business entity data, enabling searches across 9 state registries, SEC EDGAR filings, federal contracts, and lobbying disclosures.
      6
      1
      -

    • guardian-contributions-mcp

      cstillick
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for Oklahoma campaign finance data, enabling queries on combined pre-primary and continuing contributions, candidate flags, and more via natural language.
      13
      MIT

    • fec-mcp

      bsilha
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that searches official FEC PDF rulebooks for compliance and contribution limits, and provides real-time lookups against the OpenFEC API for candidates, committees, filings, and financial data.
      -

    • gov-transparency-mcp

      forgemeshlabs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for US government transparency data (congressional trades, federal contracts, campaign finance, lobbying, regulations) with per-call paid access via x402 USDC.
      4
      10
      71 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of political finance: campaign summary, candidate fundraising, congressional votes, PAC spending, industry donors, and individual donations. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun pattern. Most start with 'get_', but one uses 'search_', which is a minor inconsistency. Overall, the naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a political finance domain. Each tool covers a key area without being overwhelming or underwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover major facets of campaign finance: summary, candidate, PACs, donors, and votes. Minor gaps like independent expenditures or lobbyist data exist but are not critical for basic use.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources