get_author_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the data source (OpenAlex) and the type of data returned, which adds some transparency. However, it lacks details about error handling, authentication needs, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but provides only partial disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence stating the core function, one line about the data source, and an Args section with a brief parameter description. Every sentence adds value without repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema), the description adequately covers the purpose and data types. It lacks explicit mention of output structure, but the examples of data (publication counts, citations, fields) provide sufficient context for an agent to understand the tool's function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'name' is explained with a description and a concrete example ('Yoshua Bengio'), adding meaning beyond the schema's property title. Although schema coverage is 0%, the description compensates effectively, though it could be more precise about name format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for an author and displays profile information, including specific data types (publication counts, citation metrics, research fields). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like search_papers or get_citations by focusing on author profiles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not specify when to choose this over get_citations or search_papers, nor does it mention any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.