A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that automatically optimizes AI prompts using evolutionary algorithms, helping improve prompt performance, creativity, and reliability through iterative testing and refinement.
12
3
MIT
community-prompt-voting-mcp-server
by AiAgentKarl
Related Servers
Alternatives to community-prompt-voting-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server provides research-backed prompt optimization tools and professional domain templates designed to improve AI performance through strategies like Tree of Thoughts and Medprompt. It enables users to analyze, auto-optimize, and refine prompts using advanced reasoning patterns and safety-critical alignment techniques.25MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for generating Midjourney images through conversation, with tools for prompt composition, self-curation, and image processing.2Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that evaluates prompts using AI to provide detailed feedback on clarity, completeness, and effectiveness.5-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing on-demand access to official prompting guides for building robust meta-prompts.23MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for professional prompt engineering and agentic scaffolding, with cloud and local optimization.6-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools like upvote_prompt and downvote_prompt are clearly distinct. However, get_category_rankings, get_trending_prompts, and get_voting_info all provide listings of prompts with different sorting, which could cause some confusion, but descriptions clearly differentiate their purposes.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with clear verbs (downvote, upvote, get, search, submit) and nouns (prompt, rankings, prompts, voting_info).
Tool Count5/5
Seven tools is appropriate for a community prompt voting system, covering submission, voting, and various listing views without being excessive.
Completeness3/5
The set covers submission and voting but lacks tools for updating or deleting prompts, and there is no tool to retrieve a single prompt by ID, which are basic operations for a prompt library. This leaves gaps in typical CRUD coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues