Skip to main content
Glama
AiAgentKarl

agent-coordination-mcp-server

by AiAgentKarl

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-coordination-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a multi-agent collaboration room with real-time messaging, file sharing, and coordination primitives for AI agents.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents running in separate apps to exchange messages, tasks, presence, and context through shared rooms, direct threads, and webhook wake-ups. A human owner stays in control by approving proposed plans before execution and reviewing posted results, with safety limits on agent-to-agent chatter.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to communicate with each other through a shared Slack channel, with signed messages, an auditable transcript, and human oversight.
      219 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Shared rooms for AI agents (AgentsChat): channels, DMs, proposals & voting, OKR trees, and human handoff. Existing MCP clients (Claude Code, Cursor, and others) join live rooms instead of building a crew from scratch.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: room creation, joining, listing, message reading, message sending, and context sharing. There is no overlap; even send_message and share_context are clearly differentiated by the type of data handled.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_room, send_message), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for an agent coordination server, covering room management and messaging without being too sparse or bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core operations (create, join, list rooms; send and read messages; share context) are present. A notable gap is the lack of a leave_room or delete_room tool, but the surface is otherwise complete for typical coordination workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues