getReferralsConfigurations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full behavioral disclosure burden. It fails to state that this is a read-only operation, what it returns, or any permissions or side effects. 'Get' weakly implies read-only, but no substantive behavior is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two words long, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It omits essential context and provides no structural benefit, similar to a stub.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one parameter, no output schema), but the description is still inadequate. It does not explain what a 'referral configuration' is or what the response will contain, leaving the agent without enough information to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers the single parameter 'lang' with a description ('If the lang header is provided'). Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate; the description adds no additional parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get referral' is a vague fragment that essentially restates the tool name without adding specificity. It does not clarify that this retrieves configuration settings, nor does it distinguish from getCustomerReferrals.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like getCampaignsConfigurations or getCustomerReferrals. The description gives no context about the intended use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.