snowmcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to snowmcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThe most comprehensive ServiceNow MCP server. 17 tools for full CRUD, CMDB graph traversal, background scripts, ATF testing, and more.17135 npm13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to a ServiceNow instance, providing tools for Table API CRUD, incident lifecycle, CMDB queries, knowledge search, and user lookup.38 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables authenticated interaction with a ServiceNow Personal Developer Instance through OAuth 2.0, exposing tools to test connectivity and perform generic CRUD operations on any ServiceNow table plus flow management on the sys_hub_flow table.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable AI agents to safely read and write ServiceNow records via the Table API, including querying, creating, updating records, running server-side scripts, and triggering CI/CD tests and scans.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceAI-powered ServiceNow developer toolkit for Claude Code with 116 tools covering script generation, code review, portal and catalog development, notifications, user and group management, CRUD operations, dictionary overrides, data migration, bidirectional integrations, ATF testing, performance analysis, technical documentation, and issue diagnosis.1001-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with ServiceNow through MCP, providing schema inspection, record CRUD, attachments, audit, Flow Designer, and platform investigations with policy-guarded access.151,918 PyPI4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Tools are cleanly partitioned by domain (schema, read, write, aggregate, graph, catalog, files, code, ops, knowledge, state, journal, admin), so an agent can generally pick the right one. Minor overlap remains: sn_ops action=stats versus sn_aggregate action=stats, and sn_code action=where_used versus sn_graph action=impact, though their descriptions mostly clarify the intended scope.
All tool names follow a strict sn_<domain> snake_case pattern with no mixing of conventions. The action=... parameter style is used uniformly across every multi-action tool, making the surface highly predictable.
Thirteen tools is well-scoped for a broad platform like ServiceNow, and the multi-action design consolidates many operations into coherent domains. Each tool earns its place without bloating the surface.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: schema introspection, CRUD via sn_read/sn_write, aggregation, CMDB graph traversal, catalog ordering, attachments, code search, instance operations, local memory, write journaling/undo, and admin surfaces. No obvious dead ends for the stated ServiceNow automation purpose.