mintsoft_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description compensates by explicitly stating read-only nature, path relativity, and safety guarantee. Lacks details on error handling or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no filler, front-loaded with key information. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple generic passthrough with two parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose, path, and safety. Could mention that 'params' represent query parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage; description clarifies 'path' is relative to /api/, but does not explain 'params' object or its usage. Some value added but incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it is a generic READ-ONLY passthrough for GET requests, with an example path. Distinguishes itself from sibling tools that target specific endpoints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly suggests use when no specific endpoint tool exists, but lacks explicit 'when to use' or 'when not to use' guidance. Could be improved by stating it is a fallback.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.