Skip to main content
Glama
Aguantar

vibescan-mcp-server

by Aguantar

Related Servers

Alternatives to vibescan-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of code and URLs for security vulnerabilities (hardcoded secrets, missing headers, etc.) via Claude Code, integrating with the vibe-audit security scanner.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.
      45 PyPI
      2
      LGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered security scanning of codebases through conversational analysis, allowing users to assess, threat model, code review, DAST test, and generate security reports using natural language with Claude.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to scan projects for security issues such as leaked API keys, missing Supabase RLS, open Firebase rules, unauthenticated routes, and hallucinated packages, then fix and verify the results.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered security code review for Claude Code that runs multiple scanners (CodeQL, Semgrep, etc.) to detect vulnerabilities, secrets, and dependency CVEs, producing prioritized reports.
      2
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one lists detection rules, the other performs scans. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent 'vibescan_' prefix with a verb_noun pattern ('rules' for list, 'scan' for execute), making it predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the set is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but it is still reasonable for a focused security scanner. Each tool serves a distinct and necessary function.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow of learning about rules and running scans. A minor gap is the absence of a tool to view a single rule in detail, but the overall surface is adequate for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive