inspect_license

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes the return format but does not explicitly state read-only behavior or any side effects. For a read inspection tool, adding 'This operation does not modify any data' would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a one-line purpose, followed by parameter descriptions and return type. It is concise with no redundant information, earning its place efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately explains the return as a dict of license properties. The two input modes are fully covered. For a simple inspection tool, this is complete and sufficient for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description provides clear, detailed semantics for both parameters: record_id as an integer Zenodo ID and license_id as an SPDX identifier with an example. It also clarifies that only one should be provided, adding valuable context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Analyze the properties of a license' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling 'search_by_license' by focusing on inspecting properties of a known license rather than searching for records by license.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains two input modes (via record_id or license_id) but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search_by_license'. Usage context is implied but no exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.