PayPal Agentic Guardrail
Related Servers
Alternatives to PayPal Agentic Guardrail
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to route PayPal money-moving requests through deterministic spending rules, AI injection and intent checks, human approvals, and tamper-evident audit logging.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to make PayPal payments under plain-English spending rules, with deterministic checks and an AI auditor that can only tighten decisions, plus human approval for unusual purchases.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables store owners to reorder from suppliers by voice or chat and settle payments through PayPal, while a deterministic policy engine enforces spending limits, allow-listed suppliers, price-jump and duplicate checks so the LLM can only propose payments, never move money. Funds are authorized rather than charged, then captured only for goods verified on delivery via a 3-way match, with step-up human approval for unusual orders and a full audit ledger of every authorization, capture, void and refund.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to use paid MCP tools within a human-approved budget by holding a PayPal sandbox authorization, checking each call against policy, recording usage in a durable ledger, and capturing or voiding the authorization at session close.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to carry out PayPal payments, invoice recordings, and refunds through a fail-closed firewall that enforces spending limits and trusted recipients, cross-checks requests against account records, and screens for prompt injection. Unusual or unverifiable requests are halted and escalated to a human for approval before any execution.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to propose structured payment intents, apply deterministic policy, require human approval, and record tamper-evident audit trails without connecting to live payment rails.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two top-level tools have clearly distinct roles: one discovers authorised operations and their schemas, the other executes exactly one operation. Within run_payment_operation, the six embedded operations are also clearly differentiated by purpose and required identifiers.
Both tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_payment_operations and run_payment_operation. The embedded operation names also follow the same convention, making the set predictable.
Only two top-level tools is slightly thin by usual MCP server standards, but the dispatcher pattern is appropriate for a guardrail server: discovery and execution are intentionally separated, and run_payment_operation encapsulates six distinct operations.
The surface covers the main payment lifecycle: charge, capture, show order, refund, supplier payout, and show payout. A minor gap is the lack of a way to list previously issued order, capture, or payout batch IDs, so agents must retain those IDs from prior responses.